You are currently browsing all posts tagged with 'sigmund freud'

Anxiety: Learning = Relief

  • Posted on July 1, 2009 at 9:04 pm

Anxiety – it’s something everyone experiences from time to time. But for some it’s an ongoing, life-disrupting pain in the tush. Aside from understanding anxiety purely within the context of how it feels – well – just what exactly is it? See, I believe finding the answer to this question is the longest first step toward learning to manage anxiety and its fallout.
Now, coming to know the concept of anxiety at a healing level calls for a bit more than a quick glance at a dictionary. Yes, it calls for a bit of psycho-babble. But hang in there, as I think you’ll find these two theoretical points of view interesting and relevant.

The fans in the psychoanalytic section of the stadium would more than likely root for the theories of Sigmund Freud, who just happens to be the father (you’ll make him neurotic if you even imply “mother”) of psychoanalysis. Of particular note is Uncle Siggy’s structural theory, which proposes the human psyche has three components – the id: home of our inborn primitive desires, which stomps its feet and demands immediate gratification and release no matter the consequences (the “pleasure principle”); the superego: our active conscious, which maintains a sense of morality and prohibits the practice of social taboos; and the ego: our great internal mediator, managing the interplay of the id, superego, and our external world.

Now, according to Freud, the ego is especially significant because it strives to establish a state of balance and peace between our primitive drives, morals, and world-reality. So the ego has its work cut out for it as it deals with some incredibly powerful forces. All of this said, when our id demands some sort of immediate primal satisfaction, and our superego responds that such behavior is totally inappropriate, our ego gets put to the test and can easily become overwhelmed. According to Uncle Siggy, it’s this dynamic that generates anxiety. And anxiety is all about sounding a 150-decibel alarm so the ego knows it, as well as its designated-human, is in peril. Now, there are other paradigms (foundational philosophical/theoretical frameworks of a school of thought or discipline) I find attractive. Here’s one of them.

The cognitivists, who subscribe to the notion that emotional distress is generated when we fail to identify the details of our thought patterns and make indicated adjustments, would submit anxiety is not a direct cause of this distress. Indeed, the seemingly endless waves of anxiety many endure are the result of a faulty internal fear response system that demands immediate attention to real or perceived danger. Now, the keyword in the last sentence is “perceived.” Come on – it’s no great secret that in the vast majority of cases our sensed dangers aren’t based in rational fact. Right? And if the present danger isn’t rationally-real then the subsequent anxiety becomes inappropriate and counterproductive to our immediate and future functioning.

So, then – according to the cognitivists issue numero uno isn’t the generation of anxiety, because in the midst of dangerous circumstances it’s supposed to make an appearance. And if you think about it, doesn’t it make sense that human genetics would foster a leaning toward the anxious? Sure. And that’s because an alarm system that doesn’t give a rip about what exactly set it off provides maximum protection in any situation where disaster may well be lurking. And having a leg-up on such disaster is well worth the cost of troublesome false alarms.

See, the cognitivists would propose the issue that causes all the problems within the realm of anxiety are the thought patterns that are foundational in the misinterpretation of internal and external stimuli (a shortened breath, a heart palpitation, boarding an airplane, crossing a bridge) leading to overreaction to a perceived reality. You see, the true threat here actually becomes the creation and impact of faulty thinking patterns, misinterpretations, and overreactions. And that’s what makes anxiety a major liability.

To assist you in organizing and understanding the two anxiety theories I’ve just reviewed, how ‘bout this summary.

Psychoanalytic
Unconscious forces collide as the id pushes toward immediate gratification of a primal desire, and the superego tells it to chill-out because it isn’t socially acceptable. The ego, in a frantic attempt to mediate, becomes overwhelmed and anxiety is generated. Anxiety is a message – an alarm – to the ego that it, and the individual, is in danger.

Cognitive
Anxiety is not a direct cause of distress, but the result of a faulty internal fear response system. It’s an emotional reaction in response to the cognitive process of fear. The generation of anxiety is designed to be a call to action – an alarm – to deescalate a world-real threat. But the threat may be a perceived reality based upon misinterpretation

So there’s the scoop from just two theoretical perspectives regarding the origin of anxiety. And as you can well imagine there are many more points of view floating around out there. The importance of such formal definitions is in learning all we can about icky stuff that impacts our lives. And the more we know, the better armed we become. Right?

Anxiety – learn and find relief.

After a life-long bout with panic disorder I found my life’s passion. So I earned my master’s degree and counseling credentials, and I’m now doing all I can to lend a hand to those having a tough time.

I authored a panic disorder education and recovery eworkbook entitled, “Panic! …and Poetic Justice,” which is available on my website, www.hopeandhealingdynamics.com. Check it out – lots of good stuff.

Article Source: Anxiety: Learning = Relief

  • Share/Bookmark

What Do My Dreams Mean?

  • Posted on July 1, 2009 at 9:04 pm

For centuries society has been using dream interpretation to determine the meanings behind dreams. There are a lot of different theories about how to interpret dreams and what they mean. From the ancient Greeks and Egyptians to more modern psychological theories, dream interpretation has been around a long time.

Dream interpretation started in ancient times when the Greeks and Egyptians believed that dreams were supernatural and only those with “certain powers” could decipher the meanings. The ancient Greeks tried to use dreams to cure their sick. Sick individuals were sent to temples called Asclepieions to incubate dreams. Incubating refers to the belief that one can will himself to dream a divine dream and thus cure himself of any ailments. The ancient Egyptians used priests to interpret dreams as it was believed dreams came from God.

In today’s world most people refer to psychology to interpret dreams. Sigmund Freud believed that dreams were simply a visual representation of wish-fulfilment. Freud’s works on dream interpretation, The Interpretation of Dreams, was published in 1899. He argued that dreams occurred the day after humans experienced a desire for an object or idea. According to Freud, children’s dreams reflect exactly what they desire without the need to mask it with symbolism. Adults’ dreams, however, become distorted. The original meaning of the dream is lost in imagery and symbolism making dream interpretation much harder.

Freud’s theory on dream interpretation takes into account the ego and super-ego. The unconscious mind is thought to hold desires that never make it to the conscious mind thus emerging in dreams. Because the unconscious does not necessarily want the waking mind or the conscious mind to know its true desires, the dreams’ original “latent content” is hidden using symbols and other images to represent the true desire.

Freud’s former student, Carl Jung, disagreed somewhat with Freud’s theories on dream interpretation citing them as “simplistic and naive.” Jung believed that dreams could represent some wish-fulfilment, but also represented attitudes held by the unconscious that the conscious mind was not aware of. He felt that it would be difficult to thoroughly interpret someone’s dreams without understanding what they were experiencing in life at that moment, since people’s attitudes can change based on their current situation.

Calvin S. Hall offered a different meaning to dreams. He felt that dreams were a collection of thoughts or just one thought that occurred during sleep. Dreams would be a representation of this person’s perception of that thought or group of thoughts.

Yet another opinion on dream interpretation comes from Ann Faraday who in the 1970s published several books on dream interpretation and how to do-it-yourself. Faraday believed that dreams served as warnings of future events or prophecies.

People today seek meanings to their dreams often. Many people feel that there is definite meaning to their dreams and often find guidance in this meaning. There are many published books on dream interpretation that help individuals determine what their dreams mean according to the symbols in the dreams. In addition to books there are several websites and blogs dedicated to dream interpretation.

Keith Ward is the Founder and Director of the Circle of Professional Clairvoyants, which offers Psychic Readings with fully qualified Senior UK Clairvoyants and Psychics.

Article Source: What Do My Dreams Mean?

  • Share/Bookmark